Cancer is the leading cause of death in adult dogs. Understanding treatment options through a quality-of-life lens helps owners and vets make welfare-centered decisions.
Cancer in dogs requires welfare-centered thinking that places the dog's experience at the center of treatment decisions. Curative intent treatment is welfare-appropriate when side effects are manageable and the probability of meaningful life extension is real. However, aggressive treatment that causes significant suffering for modest or uncertain benefit is not automatically welfare-positive. The welfare question is always: what is this dog's experience today, and what will it be with and without treatment? Quality-of-life scales provide a structured way to assess this rather than making decisions based on owner attachment or guilt. Palliative care that prioritizes comfort and meaningful daily experience is often the highest-welfare choice for dogs with poor prognosis cancers.