Grizzly Bear Conflict and Hazing Programs

Non-lethal hazing programs have proven effective in reducing human-grizzly conflict, offering a welfare-friendly alternative to lethal control.

Key Facts

Grizzly bear populations have recovered from historical lows of 150 bears to over 1,000 in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem
Human-bear conflict is the leading cause of grizzly bear mortality in most recovery areas
Hazing using rubber bullets, bean bags, and aversive conditioning reduces repeat conflict by 70%
Bears that receive hazing show lasting behavioral changes away from human-occupied areas
Lethal removal of conflict bears creates social disruption that can increase subsequent conflicts

Welfare Considerations

Hazing programs protect both human safety and bear welfare simultaneously. Bears that are hazed experience acute but brief aversive experiences with lasting behavioral benefits. Lethal control causes acute suffering and eliminates individuals from a recovering population. The evidence base for hazing has grown substantially over two decades.

What You Can Do

Support wildlife agencies that invest in non-lethal conflict management programs
Secure food sources at campsites and properties in bear habitat to reduce attractants
Advocate for bear spray accessibility and education in grizzly range communities