Routine antibiotic use in livestock farming masks poor welfare conditions while driving antimicrobial resistance that threatens both animal and human health.
The relationship between antibiotic use and animal welfare is inverse: farms with better welfare conditions need fewer antibiotics because healthier, less stressed animals resist disease better. When antibiotics are used preventively to compensate for crowded, stressful conditions rather than to treat sick animals, they function as a welfare substitute rather than a welfare support. Reducing antibiotic use through welfare improvements is simultaneously better for animals, humans, and the long-term effectiveness of veterinary medicine.