The barefoot horse movement advocates for trimming horses without shoes, claiming welfare benefits, but evidence is mixed and the approach requires careful individual assessment.
The barefoot debate reflects genuine uncertainty about optimal hoof management rather than clear right and wrong answers. For horses with healthy hooves, appropriate work demands, and good management, barefoot trimming may provide welfare benefits through improved circulation and proprioception. However, the transition period can be uncomfortable, and forcing barefoot management on horses with pathological hoof conditions can cause significant welfare harm. Individual assessment by a qualified professional is essential - ideological rigidity in either direction (always shod vs. always barefoot) risks compromising horse welfare.