Laboratory mice are the most commonly used research animal, yet their welfare in research settings varies enormously. Evidence-based enrichment is moving from optional to expected in responsible research institutions.
Laboratory mouse welfare has been transformed by decades of enrichment research that has demonstrated unambiguously that enriched housing produces less stressed, healthier animals whose data quality is actually improved by better welfare. The argument that enrichment confounds research outcomes has been largely refuted - stressed, stereotypy-displaying mice in barren environments are the confounded model, not enriched ones. The remaining gap is implementation: institutions that understand enrichment best practices must translate this into standard housing across all mouse facilities. The welfare-science-research quality alignment is the strongest possible argument for enrichment adoption: providing better welfare produces better science. This framing makes enrichment investment compelling to research institutions with both welfare and scientific quality commitments.