Scientific estimates of wild mammal biomass reveal the enormous scale of animal populations experiencing welfare conditions, providing important context for understanding the potential scale of welfare improvements in wild animal populations.
Understanding the scale of wild animal populations provides important context for animal welfare priorities. If wild animals experience significant welfare-relevant states, the potential scale of suffering in nature vastly exceeds that in human-managed systems. This scale argument suggests that wild animal welfare research and practical interventions, though in their infancy, could potentially affect more individual animals than any other welfare domain. The uncertainty about wild animal sentience and the practical challenges of intervention do not negate the importance of taking the scale question seriously in welfare priority-setting.