The UK badger population sits at the center of an intense debate about bovine tuberculosis control. Understanding the welfare implications of culling versus vaccination informs evidence-based advocacy.
The badger TB debate presents genuine welfare trade-offs. Individual badgers killed in culls face acute welfare harm; the welfare case for culling rests on its contested contribution to reducing TB in cattle. Vaccination avoids lethal welfare harm to badgers while providing some protection against infection spread. The scientific evidence on culling effectiveness is genuinely contested, which strengthens the welfare case for prioritizing vaccination - an intervention that achieves TB control goals without certain, large-scale lethal harm to individual badgers.