Wildlife

Wild Barn Owl Welfare and Agricultural Intensification

Barn owls have declined significantly in intensively farmed landscapes, with welfare impacts from rodenticide secondary poisoning and prey scarcity affecting individual bird health.

Key Facts

Welfare Considerations

Barn owl welfare illustrates how agricultural landscape change affects individual animal welfare through both direct and indirect pathways. The primary indirect pathway is prey scarcity: barn owls hunt almost exclusively by hearing in short grassland, and the conversion of diverse grassland to improved pasture or arable dramatically reduces field vole populations. Barn owls in vole-scarce landscapes must hunt for longer periods to meet energy needs, risking starvation in poor weather when hunting is impaired. Their inability to store significant fat reserves means even short periods of unsuccessful hunting lead to welfare-relevant energy deficit. The direct welfare pathway is rodenticide secondary poisoning: barn owls consuming voles and mice that have ingested anticoagulant rodenticides accumulate the compounds in their liver. Sublethal anticoagulant exposure may impair healing after minor injuries and contribute to long-term organ damage. Nestbox programmes provide nesting resource that was formerly provided by old farm buildings but do not address prey availability or poisoning exposure - comprehensive barn owl welfare requires landscape-scale change in farming practice alongside targeted conservation measures.

What You Can Do