CO2 stunning of pigs is the dominant commercial slaughter method but causes aversion and distress before insensibility. Alternative stunning methods offer welfare improvements but face practical barriers to adoption.
CO2 stunning represents one of the most significant unresolved welfare issues in commercial pig slaughter. The aversive nature of CO2 exposure is well-documented: pigs exposed to high-concentration CO2 attempt to escape, vocalise, and show breath-holding behaviour before losing consciousness - all indicators of aversive distress. The duration of this aversive period before insensibility is approximately 20-30 seconds, multiplied by the tens of millions of pigs stunned annually, represents an enormous aggregate welfare burden. Alternative gas mixes (nitrogen, argon, or low-CO2 mixes) that induce insensibility before or concurrent with CO2 exposure reduce or eliminate this aversive period. Barriers to adoption include capital costs of replacing existing stunning systems and gas availability. The welfare case for transition is scientifically clear; the mechanism for achieving it is regulatory and economic.