European legislation requires that pigs have access to manipulable material for enrichment, but the quality of enrichment provided varies enormously. Science increasingly specifies what makes enrichment effective rather than just technically compliant.
The gap between technically compliant and genuinely effective enrichment represents a significant welfare failure in commercial pig production. A hanging chain is not equivalent to rooting substrate in meeting pig behavioural needs, yet both satisfy minimum legal requirements. Welfare standards that specify the properties of effective enrichment (novel, varied, edible, destructible, related to natural motivation) rather than listing compliant objects would better protect welfare. Farmers who provide genuinely effective enrichment see reduced tail biting and associated costs.