The scientific understanding of fish consciousness and pain has advanced dramatically over the past two decades, significantly strengthening the case for fish welfare protections in aquaculture and wild capture fisheries.
The scientific case for fish pain and consciousness has grown from contested to compelling over the past 20 years. Fish show all the behavioural hallmarks of pain experience: avoidance, wound-directed behaviour, analgesic preference, and cognitive bias. The neurological substrates differ from mammals but the functional outcomes are similar. This matters enormously given the scale of fish farming and fishing - the numbers involved are orders of magnitude larger than all terrestrial animal agriculture combined. Despite this, fish welfare protections in most jurisdictions remain far weaker than for vertebrate land animals. Bringing fish welfare law and practice into alignment with the science is one of the most important and tractable improvements available in animal welfare policy.