Catch-and-release angling is practised by millions globally, with scientific evidence informing debates about fish pain, stress responses, and the effectiveness of release practices.
Recreational angling welfare depends substantially on the practices employed during and after capture. The evidence for fish pain and stress responses is now sufficiently strong that anglers have an ethical obligation to minimise suffering through best-practice handling and rapid release. Where fish are retained for eating, humane dispatch through spiking or priest use is both more ethical and produces better eating quality than leaving fish to suffocate.