Wildlife rehabilitation success depends on applying rigorous criteria for release readiness that prioritise animal welfare and survival prospects over emotional attachment to individual animals.
Wildlife rehabilitation involves difficult welfare decisions. Investing intensive resources to rehabilitate animals that are unlikely to survive or thrive post-release may cause more suffering through the rehabilitation process than would early euthanasia of animals with poor prognoses. Rigorous honest assessment of release prospects serves animal welfare better than optimistic rehabilitation attempts. Where animals genuinely cannot be released, the decision to keep them as permanent residents requires honest evaluation of whether an appropriate quality of life can be maintained, or whether euthanasia is the kindest option.