Scientific evidence increasingly supports fish capacity for pain, raising welfare questions about catch-and-release angling practices and minimum intervention standards.
The debate about fish pain and consciousness has important welfare implications for the hundreds of millions of fish caught recreationally each year. The precautionary principle suggests that where there is credible evidence of pain capacity, welfare precautions are justified. Current best practice guidelines for catch-and-release significantly reduce welfare harms compared to traditional methods at relatively low cost to anglers.