Forced moulting of laying ducks through feed restriction extends productive laying cycles but causes significant welfare harms.
Feed restriction-induced moulting causes prolonged hunger stress and weight loss of 20-30% body weight. The welfare cost is substantial and spread over a week or more. Low-nutrient diet alternatives can achieve moult without the hunger component, and their welfare advantage is clear. The continued use of feed restriction moulting reflects cost considerations rather than welfare necessity.