Wildlife rehabilitators care for injured and orphaned animals, but determining when release is appropriate requires balancing welfare considerations with conservation priorities.
Animals that cannot be released face a quality-of-life determination that is among the most difficult in wildlife care. Lifetime captivity for a wild animal that retains strong ranging instincts may represent greater suffering than euthanasia. Animals that are almost but not fully releasable face a difficult intermediate situation. The question of when rehabilitation serves animal welfare versus prolongs suffering in an irrecoverable situation requires careful, case-by-case assessment guided by evidence-based criteria.