Pharmaceutical testing requires animal testing at multiple stages of development, but the Three Rs framework and advancing alternative technologies are progressively reducing the welfare burden.
Pharmaceutical animal testing creates a genuine ethical tension between the welfare of test animals and the potential health benefits for humans and other animals of the drugs being developed. The moral weight of this trade-off requires that the animal welfare burden be minimized through rigorous Three Rs application, and that alternatives be adopted whenever scientifically validated. The failure rate of animal-tested drugs in human trials suggests that the predictive value of animal models is lower than often assumed, providing both a welfare and a scientific argument for accelerating alternative development. The US regulatory reform removing mandatory animal testing is a significant policy shift enabling faster adoption of alternatives.