One Health and Animal Welfare

One Health — the recognition that human health, animal health, and environmental health are fundamentally interconnected — provides a powerful framework for animal welfare advocacy. By demonstrating that animal welfare improvements deliver human health benefits, welfare advocates can build coalitions beyond traditional animal protection circles.

75%
New human diseases originate in animals
700K+
AMR deaths/yr now
10M
Projected AMR deaths/yr by 2050
COVID-19
Estimated $12T economic cost
WHO/FAO/UNEP/WOAH
Quadripartite One Health leadership
Growing
Policy integration momentum

What Is One Health?

One Health is an integrated, unifying approach that recognizes the health of humans, domestic and wild animals, plants, and the wider environment are closely linked and inter-dependent. It was formally adopted by WHO, FAO, OIE (now WOAH), and UNEP in 2021 with the One Health Joint Plan of Action.

For animal welfare, One Health is both a scientific framework and a strategic opportunity — demonstrating that animal welfare improvements generate human health and economic benefits creates allies and policy windows beyond the conventional animal welfare community.

Zoonotic Disease: Where Animal and Human Welfare Converge

Approximately 60-75% of emerging human infectious diseases originate in animals (zoonoses). The conditions that cause animal welfare problems also create zoonotic disease risk:

Factory Farming and Pandemic Risk

High-density livestock operations create ideal conditions for pathogen emergence and amplification:

Pandemic Prevention Investment: The COVID-19 pandemic cost an estimated $12 trillion globally. Investments in pandemic prevention — including reducing high-density livestock farming, improving wild-domestic animal interfaces, and eliminating live animal markets — represent extraordinary value relative to their cost. Animal welfare improvements in livestock farming are pandemic prevention.

Live Animal Markets

Live animal markets — where diverse wild and domestic species are held in close proximity under stress — create ideal conditions for cross-species pathogen transmission. Improving welfare conditions in markets (species separation, reduced crowding, humane slaughter) simultaneously reduces zoonotic risk and animal suffering.

Antibiotic Resistance: A One Health Crisis

The connection between livestock antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, and human health consequences is among the most well-documented One Health links. Improving livestock welfare — by reducing crowding and stress that necessitate prophylactic antibiotic use — directly reduces AMR risk:

PathwayAnimal Welfare ImpactHuman Health Impact
Reduce stocking densityReduces stress, improves welfareReduces disease pressure, antibiotic need
Provide enrichmentReduces tail-biting, injuriesReduces wound infections requiring antibiotics
Eliminate growth promotersRemoves unnecessary drug exposureReduces resistance selection pressure
Improve nutritionImproves immune functionReduces disease susceptibility
Better ventilationReduces respiratory diseaseReduces antibiotic use for respiratory illness

Food Safety and Animal Welfare

Animal welfare and food safety are closely linked:

Temple Grandin's Insight: Dr. Temple Grandin's welfare-driven slaughterhouse reforms — reducing stress through better facility design, handling protocols, and stunning — improved both animal welfare and meat quality simultaneously. This demonstrates that welfare and commercial interests can align.

Environmental Health: The Third Pillar

Animal welfare, human health, and environmental sustainability are connected through several pathways:

Wildlife and Ecosystem Health

Healthy wildlife populations in healthy ecosystems provide services (pollination, pest control, carbon sequestration) that benefit human health. Species at the human-wildlife interface — bats, rodents, primates — that serve as disease reservoirs need habitat protection for their own welfare and for pandemic prevention.

Livestock Climate Impact

Industrial livestock production contributes approximately 14.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Climate change undermines ecosystem health, threatens wildlife populations, and destabilizes the agricultural systems that feed humans and animals. Reducing intensive livestock production for welfare reasons simultaneously reduces climate impacts.

One Health Policy Integration

The One Health Joint Plan of Action (2022-2026) of the Quadripartite (WHO, FAO, UNEP, WOAH) explicitly recognizes animal welfare as part of One Health. Key policy integration areas:

National Action Plans

Countries developing National Action Plans on AMR are increasingly incorporating animal welfare components. The recognition that welfare improvements reduce antibiotic use is creating policy alignment previously absent between animal welfare advocates and public health officials.

Pandemic Preparedness

The pandemic treaty negotiations at WHO include provisions related to animal-human interfaces. Animal welfare advocates have a seat at this table for the first time, arguing that welfare reforms — reduced livestock density, live market reform, wildlife trade regulation — are pandemic prevention investments.

Strategic Implications for Animal Welfare Advocacy

One Health offers animal welfare advocates a powerful strategic framework:

  1. Expand the coalition — public health officials, medical professionals, and economists become natural allies when welfare improvements also deliver human health benefits
  2. Access different funding — pandemic prevention, AMR reduction, and food safety budgets dwarf traditional animal welfare funding
  3. Frame welfare as investment — the economic cost of zoonotic pandemics makes welfare-improving interventions economically rational
  4. Use trade policy leverage — food safety and AMR standards in trade agreements can embed welfare improvements in global supply chains
Momentum in 2025: The One Health framework has achieved genuine policy traction — incorporated in G7 and G20 declarations, funded by major development banks, and integrated into national health strategies across 100+ countries. Animal welfare advocates are increasingly fluent in One Health language and successfully leveraging it for welfare-improving policy changes.
← Back to Animal Welfare Hub