The farrowing crate — a metal frame confining the sow during farrowing and lactation — is used on the majority of commercial pig farms globally. It prevents the sow from crushing piglets but causes significant welfare problems through immobility and inability to express natural behaviour. Alternative systems are the focus of intense research and industry transition efforts.
Standard farrowing crates allow virtually no movement — sows can stand, lie, and reach the trough but cannot turn around. Confinement periods of 4–5 weeks encompassing farrowing and lactation are typical. Welfare impacts include: inability to perform pre-farrowing nesting behaviour (causing severe frustration in a highly motivated species), persistent postural restrictions causing musculoskeletal discomfort, reduced ability to respond to piglet distress, and chronic stress evidenced by elevated cortisol and stereotypic behaviours. The enrichment void and social isolation compound these effects.
Free farrowing systems allow the sow to move freely throughout or after the farrowing period, typically in a larger pen with a separate piglet protection area. Key designs include:
PigSAFE pen: A commercially developed design with a triangular piglet protection area in the corner, ensuring the sow cannot accidentally trap piglets between herself and the wall. UK research has shown comparable piglet mortality to crates in experienced stockpeople.
FAT (Farrowing and Nursing Ark Trough): Used in outdoor production, providing an enclosed, bedded farrowing area with adjacent outdoor access.
Agroecological systems: Bedded loose housing with structured zones for different activities, based on the AgroBrugge concept developed in Germany and Scandinavia.
Research comparing free farrowing to crates consistently finds: improved sow welfare indicators (lower cortisol, fewer stereotypies, better body condition retention), better expression of nesting behaviour, and more positive human-animal relationships. Piglet mortality in well-managed free farrowing systems is comparable to crates — the key determinant is stockperson skill and system design rather than the confinement itself.
Temporarily confining sows only at farrowing and releasing them 5–7 days later reduces confinement duration substantially while maintaining piglet protection during the highest-risk period. This approach is already used in Scandinavian systems and provides a significant welfare improvement within existing building infrastructure pending full free farrowing conversion.
Despite strong welfare evidence, farrowing crate use persists due to: higher initial capital costs for free farrowing conversions, perception of higher piglet mortality risk, lack of stockperson training for free farrowing management, and absence of regulatory deadlines in most markets. The EU phase-out of farrowing crates announced for 2030 (as part of the Farm to Fork strategy) provides the strongest regulatory driver yet for industry transition. Several retailers and processors have committed to sourcing free-farrowing pork ahead of any legislative deadline.
Free farrowing success is strongly dependent on stockperson skill. Monitoring sows for abnormal farrowing progress, identifying piglet welfare problems (chilling, low birth weight, insufficient colostrum access), and intervening appropriately without undermining the sow's autonomy require training and experience. Investing in stockperson training alongside system conversions is essential for successful transition.
← Back to Animal Welfare Hub