Open Philanthropy
Major grantmaker funding corporate campaigns, research, and institutional capacity. The largest single source of animal welfare philanthropy globally.
How economists and cost-effectiveness analysts are transforming animal welfare
Welfare economics asks how to allocate scarce resources to maximize wellbeing. Applied to animals, it becomes a practical question: which interventions help the most animals, the most, for the least money? This approach has shifted animal advocacy toward measurable outcomes, transparent tradeoffs, and evidence-based philanthropy.
Links: Impact calculator · Giving guide
Welfare economics evaluates how to maximize wellbeing given limited resources. For animal advocacy, it asks: which interventions produce the most wellbeing per dollar, and how certain are those outcomes?
Rather than funding whatever feels most urgent, welfare economics evaluates outcomes, cost, and scale. The goal is to make tradeoffs explicit, not hidden.
Peter Singer argues the utilitarian calculus extends to all sentient beings. Nick Beckstead popularized effective altruism’s focus on measurable impact. Dustin Moskovitz funded large-scale animal welfare research and grants through Open Philanthropy.
Estimated cost per animal helped across common interventions (Animal Charity Evaluators estimates).
| Intervention | Est. cost per animal helped |
|---|---|
| Corporate cage-free campaigns | $0.01 - $0.10 |
| Leafletting / online ads | $0.50 - $2.00 |
| Individual vegan outreach | $30 - $200 |
| Direct rescue / sanctuaries | $200 - $2,000 |
Use the impact calculator to compare personal actions and donations.
Open Philanthropy has granted over $200M to animal welfare since 2015, accelerating a field that previously relied on small donations. The effective altruism movement has directed hundreds of millions toward farmed animal welfare.
Major grantmaker funding corporate campaigns, research, and institutional capacity. The largest single source of animal welfare philanthropy globally.
The Humane League ($50M+), Animal Equality, Mercy For Animals, Good Food Institute ($70M+ for alt proteins), Wild Animal Initiative.
EA-aligned funds and donor circles have pushed the field from localized rescue toward global systems change.
Animal welfare scores unusually high on all three dimensions.
Human health uses DALYs (Disability-Adjusted Life Years). For animals, researchers propose WALYs (Welfare-Adjusted Life Years).
WALYs estimate how much suffering or wellbeing is altered by interventions. They allow apples-to-apples comparison across programs.
Weighting suffering intensity across species, uncertainty about moral patienthood, and lack of direct welfare metrics in many systems.
Rethink Priorities suggests relative weights (e.g., chicken ≈ 0.3 of human moral weight on some metrics, shrimp ≈ 0.04).
Global animal welfare philanthropy is roughly $500M/year (2024 estimate), highly concentrated among a few funders.
A structural funding gap persists despite massive scale.
Animals cannot vote or lobby; advocacy is underpowered compared to industry lobbying ($100M+/year against welfare legislation).
Identifiable victim bias favors visible individuals over statistical animals. Cultural norms further normalize factory farming.
Animal welfare philanthropy is ~$500M/year, while US livestock subsidies are roughly $38B/year. See subsidies.
Large externalities are offloaded to the public and future generations.
If externalities were priced in, the true cost of a hamburger could be $30–35, effectively subsidized by taxpayers. Learn more about systemic costs in subsidies and antibiotic resistance.
Target the most cost-effective organizations through the giving guide to maximize impact per dollar.
See the highest-impact advocacy moves in Take Action and Advocacy Effective Advocacy Compassion Fatigue.
Use the impact calculator to compare diet changes, campaigns, and giving.
“If we are to act on our highest moral principles, we should give to the organizations that will do the most good per dollar.” — Peter Singer